Thursday, March 20, 2014
RICOEUR: "HISTORY"; OR WRITING THE TRAJECTORY OF HISTORY
click link: http://www.mediafire.com/listen/qfcvsyt03c4ullg/ricoeur3.mp3
A GLOSSARY FOR PART “TWO”
OF RICOEUR’S PHENOMENOLOGY: “WRITING
PHILOSOPHY FROM AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ; OR “HISTORICAL-GAZE: “8” concepts:
1.
"KOROS-KATOIKEO": "inhabited-space"
of verbal testimony is defined as an atomic unit of meaning.
2. "OIKOUMENE": "inhabited-world"
of verbal testimony is defined as a compound unit that combines
"inhabited-space" and “cosmic-time”; and then enlisting the
motivation "EIKON" of the self to form a "historiographical
thought-picture of the truth of verbal testimony.
3.
"METREO": "being
measured by one-another at the dokounta communal threshold. Where intersubjective critical questioning
results in labeling the proposed content as
"Accredited" and then “thought-materials" are
ready for shaping into the "atomic-archival-document".
4.
"ISORIKOS-BIBLIZION": "historical-document"
as written document.
5.
"PHARMAKON": "pharmacy-mixture"
of a "remedy". Intentionality
of document is copied to consciousness with its praxis possibilities.
6.
"ATENIDZO-PRAXIS: "GAZE". Very important for Ricoeur and all
post-modern phenomenologists. The GAZE
is the self's point of view while “standing-in” at the
"composition-threshold" where the proposed written "book"
will be written. Atomic-documents
assembled into compound-unit-book.
7.
ATENIDZO-SYLLOGIKE': "INTERSUBJECTIVE-GAZE". This is what shapes the configuration of
"logos" at the historical level.
Everyone has their own "scale" that is applied to their
evaluation of events of history. Borrowed
from cartography or map-making. These
various "scales" or modalities and points-of-view can contribute to a
"collective" of traces (as in his discussion of memory. He is remaining consistent here).
8. BIBLION - BOOK: the final
representation is to be critiqued by the categorical imperative of
"JUSTICE"; and the criterion to define the
"being-of-identity". But we
are not finished. Because the self has
raised the structure of history to scholarly written discourse. And it needs to run through the process again
and again. So we never really finalize
the process. History continues to be
interrogated for its meaning. The end!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment